<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 914 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259033</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not justified as the assessee had fulfilled the conditions under Explanation 5(2). The AO was directed to delete the penalty of Rs. 4,28,043/-. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 18/02/2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 08:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 914 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259033</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was not justified as the assessee had fulfilled the conditions under Explanation 5(2). The AO was directed to delete the penalty of Rs. 4,28,043/-. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 18/02/2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>