<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 912 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259031</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by condoning the delay in filing and remanded the matters to the CIT(A) for a decision on the merits. The Tribunal emphasized the need to consider sufficient cause for condonation of delay to ensure justice on merits. The issues on the correct computation of income and entitlement to deduction under section 80P were highlighted, with directions given for the CIT(A) to decide on these matters after affording the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 912 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259031</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by condoning the delay in filing and remanded the matters to the CIT(A) for a decision on the merits. The Tribunal emphasized the need to consider sufficient cause for condonation of delay to ensure justice on merits. The issues on the correct computation of income and entitlement to deduction under section 80P were highlighted, with directions given for the CIT(A) to decide on these matters after affording the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>