<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 940 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169610</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to delete the additions made. It held that the expenditures, though not allowable under Rule 9A, are allowable under Section 37(1) as business expenditures. The assessee can set off the expenditure against the profit of one film under Section 70(1). The decision was pronounced on September 16, 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 11:11:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 940 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169610</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to delete the additions made. It held that the expenditures, though not allowable under Rule 9A, are allowable under Section 37(1) as business expenditures. The assessee can set off the expenditure against the profit of one film under Section 70(1). The decision was pronounced on September 16, 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>