<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1940 (4) TMI 25 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169595</link>
    <description>Under a territorial income-tax charging provision, the real and practical source of a receipt must be identified from the transaction as a whole. A sum realised by a liquidator on the sale of mining claims was held not to be shown as a capital receipt, because the claims had been acquired and developed as part of a profit-making scheme and the liquidation sale was the culmination of that scheme rather than a mere capital realisation. The source of the receipt was also within Southern Rhodesia, since the company&#039;s business activity and the property that generated the money were situated in the territory. The appeal therefore failed on both the capital-receipt and territorial-source issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:54:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1940 (4) TMI 25 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169595</link>
      <description>Under a territorial income-tax charging provision, the real and practical source of a receipt must be identified from the transaction as a whole. A sum realised by a liquidator on the sale of mining claims was held not to be shown as a capital receipt, because the claims had been acquired and developed as part of a profit-making scheme and the liquidation sale was the culmination of that scheme rather than a mere capital realisation. The source of the receipt was also within Southern Rhodesia, since the company&#039;s business activity and the property that generated the money were situated in the territory. The appeal therefore failed on both the capital-receipt and territorial-source issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 1940 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>