https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169585 Tribal land protection provisions were read broadly to prevent alienation of Scheduled Tribe immovable property in scheduled areas, and adverse possession by a non-tribal was treated as a prohibited means of defeating that protection. The discussion further states that the limitation period could not run against the plaintiff while the land remained under tribal ownership, and that the suit was therefore within time under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, with Section 27 not extinguishing title in the circumstances. Because the extent of encroachment and the proper relief had not been fully determined, the matter required remand for factual findings and consequential relief. en-us Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 21:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169585 Tribal land protection provisions were read broadly to prevent alienation of Scheduled Tribe immovable property in scheduled areas, and adverse possession by a non-tribal was treated as a prohibited means of defeating that protection. The discussion further states that the limitation period could not run against the plaintiff while the land remained under tribal ownership, and that the suit was therefore within time under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, with Section 27 not extinguishing title in the circumstances. Because the extent of encroachment and the proper relief had not been fully determined, the matter required remand for factual findings and consequential relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169585