https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169579 The court found that the alienations of the Plaint-Sch. IV properties by the widows were not binding on the reversioners as they were not necessary for the estate. However, the alienations were held to be voidable, and the plaintiffs were unable to avoid them due to estoppel and election. The third plaintiff was estopped from challenging the alienations, while plaintiffs 1 and 2 were estopped as they had ratified previous agreements. The dedication of properties under Ex. A-2 was deemed partial, allowing the widows a beneficial interest. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the decisions that the plaintiffs were precluded from challenging the alienations. en-us Thu, 04 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:41:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169579 The court found that the alienations of the Plaint-Sch. IV properties by the widows were not binding on the reversioners as they were not necessary for the estate. However, the alienations were held to be voidable, and the plaintiffs were unable to avoid them due to estoppel and election. The third plaintiff was estopped from challenging the alienations, while plaintiffs 1 and 2 were estopped as they had ratified previous agreements. The dedication of properties under Ex. A-2 was deemed partial, allowing the widows a beneficial interest. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the decisions that the plaintiffs were precluded from challenging the alienations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 May 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169579