<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (12) TMI 168 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169580</link>
    <description>Emergency power to disconnect telephones required the authority to form and record its own reasoned satisfaction on relevant material showing the requisite public or other emergency; a government certificate alone was not enough. The Court also held that alleged misuse or illegal use could not be dealt with under the emergency provision when a specific rule prescribed a distinct disconnection procedure with notice and opportunity to explain. A drastic statutory power must be exercised only for the purpose and in the manner authorised by the governing provision. The impugned disconnections were therefore unsustainable and the telephone connections were directed to be restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 10:52:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (12) TMI 168 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169580</link>
      <description>Emergency power to disconnect telephones required the authority to form and record its own reasoned satisfaction on relevant material showing the requisite public or other emergency; a government certificate alone was not enough. The Court also held that alleged misuse or illegal use could not be dealt with under the emergency provision when a specific rule prescribed a distinct disconnection procedure with notice and opportunity to explain. A drastic statutory power must be exercised only for the purpose and in the manner authorised by the governing provision. The impugned disconnections were therefore unsustainable and the telephone connections were directed to be restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>