https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169581 Parliament was held competent under Entry 52 of List I to enact the Tobacco Board Act, 1975 as a measure for effective control of the declared tobacco industry, including provisions touching the growing and sale of raw tobacco as reasonably incidental to that control. The Court further held that the Tobacco Board Act and State Agricultural Produce Markets Acts could not operate simultaneously in relation to tobacco sold in market areas because their operative schemes conflicted. Applying parliamentary supremacy under Article 246(1), the State levy of market fee on tobacco was held inoperative to the extent it clashed with the Central law, and the earlier majority view in ITC was affirmed. en-us Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169581 Parliament was held competent under Entry 52 of List I to enact the Tobacco Board Act, 1975 as a measure for effective control of the declared tobacco industry, including provisions touching the growing and sale of raw tobacco as reasonably incidental to that control. The Court further held that the Tobacco Board Act and State Agricultural Produce Markets Acts could not operate simultaneously in relation to tobacco sold in market areas because their operative schemes conflicted. Applying parliamentary supremacy under Article 246(1), the State levy of market fee on tobacco was held inoperative to the extent it clashed with the Central law, and the earlier majority view in ITC was affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169581