<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cross-examination required when Department&#039;s allegations rely on uncorroborated, contradictory statements to prove duty evasion charges.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22700</link>
    <description>When the Department s case against an assessee is mainly based on statements given by some persons and those statements are not corroborated by some other independent evidence, and contradict each other, for using those statements, against the assessee for proving the charge of duty evasion against their, their cross examination would be necessary. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 08:53:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 08:53:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cross-examination required when Department&#039;s allegations rely on uncorroborated, contradictory statements to prove duty evasion charges.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22700</link>
      <description>When the Department s case against an assessee is mainly based on statements given by some persons and those statements are not corroborated by some other independent evidence, and contradict each other, for using those statements, against the assessee for proving the charge of duty evasion against their, their cross examination would be necessary. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 08:53:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>