https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259014 The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner of Central Excise for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the importance of disclosing relevant facts to avoid invoking the extended limitation period. The Commissioner was directed to verify the availing of Cenvat credit for coating materials and determine the inclusion of the epoxy coating value in the assessable value of the SAW pipes. The previous order was set aside for reevaluation based on the Tribunal's observations, requiring a more thorough examination of the disputed issues. en-us Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Apr 2015 08:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259014 The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner of Central Excise for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the importance of disclosing relevant facts to avoid invoking the extended limitation period. The Commissioner was directed to verify the availing of Cenvat credit for coating materials and determine the inclusion of the epoxy coating value in the assessable value of the SAW pipes. The previous order was set aside for reevaluation based on the Tribunal's observations, requiring a more thorough examination of the disputed issues. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259014