<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 882 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259001</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court upheld the classification of rental income as income from house property rather than business income, allowed the deduction for incomplete work, and permitted the deduction of interest on borrowed capital under section 24(b) of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized that the nature of income, not its treatment in accounting books, determines its classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 882 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259001</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court upheld the classification of rental income as income from house property rather than business income, allowed the deduction for incomplete work, and permitted the deduction of interest on borrowed capital under section 24(b) of the Income Tax Act. The Court emphasized that the nature of income, not its treatment in accounting books, determines its classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>