<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 879 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258998</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of thorough documentation to substantiate transactions and income sources adequately. The judgment concluded that the unexplained small denomination demand drafts did not meet the tax-effect threshold for further legal action under Section 260A, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2015 06:29:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 879 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258998</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of thorough documentation to substantiate transactions and income sources adequately. The judgment concluded that the unexplained small denomination demand drafts did not meet the tax-effect threshold for further legal action under Section 260A, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>