<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 873 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169558</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further evaluation. The decision underscored the significance of verifying the actual usage of the property to ascertain the applicability of depreciation and the eligibility for deduction under section 50(1)(iii) based on whether the property was utilized for business purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:04:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 873 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169558</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further evaluation. The decision underscored the significance of verifying the actual usage of the property to ascertain the applicability of depreciation and the eligibility for deduction under section 50(1)(iii) based on whether the property was utilized for business purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>