<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Quashes Prosecution Due to Lack of Authorization in Cheque Dishonor Case u/ss 138 and 142.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22678</link>
    <description>Offence u/s 138 &amp; 142 of the Negotiable Instrument Act - Dishonour of cheques -an employee of the Company signed the complaint &amp; DGM of the Company gave evidence as if he knows everything though he does not know anything. There is nothing on the record to suggest that he was authorized by the Managing Director or any Director - Prosecution proceedings were rightly quashed - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 10:54:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 10:54:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Quashes Prosecution Due to Lack of Authorization in Cheque Dishonor Case u/ss 138 and 142.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22678</link>
      <description>Offence u/s 138 &amp; 142 of the Negotiable Instrument Act - Dishonour of cheques -an employee of the Company signed the complaint &amp; DGM of the Company gave evidence as if he knows everything though he does not know anything. There is nothing on the record to suggest that he was authorized by the Managing Director or any Director - Prosecution proceedings were rightly quashed - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 10:54:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>