https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169530 A State law vesting ownership in mineral rights was held not to be repugnant to the Central minerals legislation, because the Central Act regulated mining rights without excluding State power to acquire ownership in estates or tenures. The Haryana Minerals (Vesting of Rights) Act, 1973 was therefore upheld as a valid acquisition statute, subject to the Central Act in relation to mining leases and licence rights. The challenge to the impugned notifications also failed because the petitioners did not establish subsisting leasehold or licence rights under the Central Act, nor a prior demand and refusal to support mandamus. The writ petitions were dismissed, while any independent remedy for a specific protected right was left open. en-us Thu, 18 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Apr 2015 10:33:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169530 A State law vesting ownership in mineral rights was held not to be repugnant to the Central minerals legislation, because the Central Act regulated mining rights without excluding State power to acquire ownership in estates or tenures. The Haryana Minerals (Vesting of Rights) Act, 1973 was therefore upheld as a valid acquisition statute, subject to the Central Act in relation to mining leases and licence rights. The challenge to the impugned notifications also failed because the petitioners did not establish subsisting leasehold or licence rights under the Central Act, nor a prior demand and refusal to support mandamus. The writ petitions were dismissed, while any independent remedy for a specific protected right was left open. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169530