<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1947 (10) TMI 8 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169526</link>
    <description>Completed assessments under the Income-tax Act, 1922 remained valid until set aside through the statute&#039;s exclusive machinery; a later favourable decision in another matter did not render earlier assessments a nullity. Section 33 was an administrative revision power for supervisory use and did not give the assessee an independent, enforceable right to reopen assessments or obtain refund on equitable grounds. A reference under Section 66(2) lay only where the Section 33 order was prejudicial, meaning it worsened the assessee&#039;s position; a refusal to reopen without enhancing liability was not prejudicial. The statutory scheme was treated as exhaustive, and the refund and reopening claim failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 1947 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 10:04:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1947 (10) TMI 8 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169526</link>
      <description>Completed assessments under the Income-tax Act, 1922 remained valid until set aside through the statute&#039;s exclusive machinery; a later favourable decision in another matter did not render earlier assessments a nullity. Section 33 was an administrative revision power for supervisory use and did not give the assessee an independent, enforceable right to reopen assessments or obtain refund on equitable grounds. A reference under Section 66(2) lay only where the Section 33 order was prejudicial, meaning it worsened the assessee&#039;s position; a refusal to reopen without enhancing liability was not prejudicial. The statutory scheme was treated as exhaustive, and the refund and reopening claim failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 1947 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>