https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258977 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that they were not liable for RTO tax before 20.11.2006 due to the ownership history of the mobile crain. The court quashed the order demanding tax, penalty, and interest for the period pre-20.11.2006 and directed a review of tax liabilities post that date, allowing adjustments if necessary. The respondent's demand for tax pre-20.11.2006 was deemed unjustified, leading to its cancellation. The court also ordered the refund of Rs. 1 lac deposited by the petitioner, ensuring fairness and legal compliance. en-us Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Apr 2015 11:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258977 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that they were not liable for RTO tax before 20.11.2006 due to the ownership history of the mobile crain. The court quashed the order demanding tax, penalty, and interest for the period pre-20.11.2006 and directed a review of tax liabilities post that date, allowing adjustments if necessary. The respondent's demand for tax pre-20.11.2006 was deemed unjustified, leading to its cancellation. The court also ordered the refund of Rs. 1 lac deposited by the petitioner, ensuring fairness and legal compliance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258977