<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 854 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258973</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a Sponge Iron manufacturer, in a case concerning the assessable value for goods transportation charges. The Tribunal held that charges for special packing of Sponge Iron for rail transportation should not be included in the assessable value. However, loading charges for goods onto trucks in the factory were deemed includable. The Tribunal upheld the duty demand related to loading expenses but set aside the remaining duty demand, interest, and penalties. The Commissioner was directed to quantify the upheld duty demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 854 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258973</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a Sponge Iron manufacturer, in a case concerning the assessable value for goods transportation charges. The Tribunal held that charges for special packing of Sponge Iron for rail transportation should not be included in the assessable value. However, loading charges for goods onto trucks in the factory were deemed includable. The Tribunal upheld the duty demand related to loading expenses but set aside the remaining duty demand, interest, and penalties. The Commissioner was directed to quantify the upheld duty demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>