<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 839 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258958</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeals and concluding that no substantial question of law arose in the case. The judgment clarified the interpretation of Section 145A of the Income Tax Act, affirmed the justifiability of the method of accounting change by the assessee, and supported the claiming of deductions for the write off of non-moving items due to the deterioration of materials.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 839 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258958</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeals and concluding that no substantial question of law arose in the case. The judgment clarified the interpretation of Section 145A of the Income Tax Act, affirmed the justifiability of the method of accounting change by the assessee, and supported the claiming of deductions for the write off of non-moving items due to the deterioration of materials.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>