<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 297 - Orrisa high court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169517</link>
    <description>Cess on land used for mining is characterised by its charging provision, not by an assessment method linked to royalty or dead rent. A levy imposed on land remains within the State taxation field even where its computation refers to mining-related payments; royalty is payment for extracted minerals rather than a tax. Differential cess rates for mining lands rest on a valid use-based classification where applied uniformly within that class. A heavy tax burden is not confiscatory without supporting material, and an indirect effect on mining does not restrict trade under Article 301. Lease terms and the absence of a separate appeal do not invalidate a competent land levy where revision is available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:15:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 297 - Orrisa high court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169517</link>
      <description>Cess on land used for mining is characterised by its charging provision, not by an assessment method linked to royalty or dead rent. A levy imposed on land remains within the State taxation field even where its computation refers to mining-related payments; royalty is payment for extracted minerals rather than a tax. Differential cess rates for mining lands rest on a valid use-based classification where applied uniformly within that class. A heavy tax burden is not confiscatory without supporting material, and an indirect effect on mining does not restrict trade under Article 301. Lease terms and the absence of a separate appeal do not invalidate a competent land levy where revision is available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>