<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 890 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169515</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision that the educational institution was entitled to exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Income-tax Act. The Court found that the Central Government&#039;s grant of 37.85% of the total income constituted substantial financing, making the assessee eligible for the exemption. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that no substantial question of law arose for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:46:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 890 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169515</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision that the educational institution was entitled to exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Income-tax Act. The Court found that the Central Government&#039;s grant of 37.85% of the total income constituted substantial financing, making the assessee eligible for the exemption. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that no substantial question of law arose for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>