<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 393 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169513</link>
    <description>Nationalised bank premises are treated as public premises because a corporation established under a Central Act and owned or controlled by the Central Government falls within Section 2(e) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. A tenant who remains in possession after expiry or termination of the tenancy is in unauthorised occupation under Section 2(g), which expressly covers continued occupation after the authority to occupy has ended. Where premises fall within both the Public Premises Act and the Delhi Rent Control Act, the later special statute prevails for public premises, and the jurisdictional bar in Section 15 excludes reliance on rent-control protection to resist eviction proceedings under the Public Premises Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 16:01:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 393 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169513</link>
      <description>Nationalised bank premises are treated as public premises because a corporation established under a Central Act and owned or controlled by the Central Government falls within Section 2(e) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. A tenant who remains in possession after expiry or termination of the tenancy is in unauthorised occupation under Section 2(g), which expressly covers continued occupation after the authority to occupy has ended. Where premises fall within both the Public Premises Act and the Delhi Rent Control Act, the later special statute prevails for public premises, and the jurisdictional bar in Section 15 excludes reliance on rent-control protection to resist eviction proceedings under the Public Premises Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>