https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258933 The Supreme Court addressed the validity of a withdrawal Notification affecting the industrial policy in the North Eastern Region. The High Court applied the principle of promissory estoppel, ruling in favor of the respondent. However, subsequent events, including the retrospective effect of Section 154 of the Finance Act, 2003, rendered the issue moot. The Supreme Court found that the respondent was no longer entitled to the benefit under the industrial policy, leading to the dismissal of the appeals and invalidating the High Court's judgment based on promissory estoppel. en-us Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Aug 2017 11:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258933 The Supreme Court addressed the validity of a withdrawal Notification affecting the industrial policy in the North Eastern Region. The High Court applied the principle of promissory estoppel, ruling in favor of the respondent. However, subsequent events, including the retrospective effect of Section 154 of the Finance Act, 2003, rendered the issue moot. The Supreme Court found that the respondent was no longer entitled to the benefit under the industrial policy, leading to the dismissal of the appeals and invalidating the High Court's judgment based on promissory estoppel. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 10 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258933