<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 806 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258925</link>
    <description>Imported insulating or taping material did not qualify for customs exemption under Notification No. 25/99-Cus. when used to manufacture degaussing coils, because the notification granted relief only for the specified raw material used in making the finished goods named against it. The text treats degaussing coil and inductor as distinct entries within the notification, so a degaussing coil could not be equated with an inductor, and insulating material could not be stretched to cover wire. The scope of a concessional exemption cannot be enlarged beyond its express terms, so the exemption was unavailable and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2015 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 806 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258925</link>
      <description>Imported insulating or taping material did not qualify for customs exemption under Notification No. 25/99-Cus. when used to manufacture degaussing coils, because the notification granted relief only for the specified raw material used in making the finished goods named against it. The text treats degaussing coil and inductor as distinct entries within the notification, so a degaussing coil could not be equated with an inductor, and insulating material could not be stretched to cover wire. The scope of a concessional exemption cannot be enlarged beyond its express terms, so the exemption was unavailable and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>