<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 789 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258908</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. The CIT(A)&#039;s order was upheld based on the AO&#039;s remand report, resulting in the deletion of the addition of Rs. 45,387/- on account of un-reconciled interest. The initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) was deemed premature and dismissed, while the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C was considered consequential and also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 08:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 789 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258908</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. The CIT(A)&#039;s order was upheld based on the AO&#039;s remand report, resulting in the deletion of the addition of Rs. 45,387/- on account of un-reconciled interest. The initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) was deemed premature and dismissed, while the levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C was considered consequential and also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>