<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 788 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258907</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, ruling that the payments did not qualify for exemptions under Rule 6DD. The assessee was found to have been given sufficient opportunity to present its case, and the appeal was dismissed in full. The judgment stressed adherence to statutory provisions and the limited circumstances in which exceptions to cash payment disallowances are allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 788 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258907</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, ruling that the payments did not qualify for exemptions under Rule 6DD. The assessee was found to have been given sufficient opportunity to present its case, and the appeal was dismissed in full. The judgment stressed adherence to statutory provisions and the limited circumstances in which exceptions to cash payment disallowances are allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>