<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 785 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258904</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 15 lakhs under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the quantum appeal. However, the penalty appeal was allowed, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for allegedly filing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal emphasized the distinction between penalty and assessment proceedings and referred to relevant case law to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2015 06:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 785 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258904</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 15 lakhs under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the quantum appeal. However, the penalty appeal was allowed, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for allegedly filing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal emphasized the distinction between penalty and assessment proceedings and referred to relevant case law to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>