https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169501 Section 2(bb) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was treated as an incorporation by reference of the definition of "Banking Company" in Section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 as it stood when inserted, not as a dynamic reference to later amendments. As a result, the subsequent extension of the banking law to cover co-operative banks did not expand the Industrial Disputes Act's meaning for this purpose. The Court therefore held that the appellant multi-State co-operative bank was not brought within Section 2(bb) by later changes to the banking statute, and the State Government remained the appropriate government under Section 2(a), not the Central Government. en-us Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169501 Section 2(bb) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was treated as an incorporation by reference of the definition of "Banking Company" in Section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 as it stood when inserted, not as a dynamic reference to later amendments. As a result, the subsequent extension of the banking law to cover co-operative banks did not expand the Industrial Disputes Act's meaning for this purpose. The Court therefore held that the appellant multi-State co-operative bank was not brought within Section 2(bb) by later changes to the banking statute, and the State Government remained the appropriate government under Section 2(a), not the Central Government. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169501