<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (3) TMI 35 - Calcutta High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169494</link>
    <description>Import licence conditions were upheld as valid where the Chief Controller and an authorised licensing officer acted within the continuing statutory order, and the authentication objection was treated as directory. A condition restricting the imported goods to use in the licence-holder&#039;s factory was also sustained as part of the import-control scheme and ancillary to regulating imports. The notifications were not ultra vires, since they were directed to import control and any effect on post-import use was incidental. However, breach of a licence condition did not amount to an offence under Section 5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947, because the section penalised contravention of an order, not mere non-compliance with a licence term. The revisional application was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:29:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (3) TMI 35 - Calcutta High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169494</link>
      <description>Import licence conditions were upheld as valid where the Chief Controller and an authorised licensing officer acted within the continuing statutory order, and the authentication objection was treated as directory. A condition restricting the imported goods to use in the licence-holder&#039;s factory was also sustained as part of the import-control scheme and ancillary to regulating imports. The notifications were not ultra vires, since they were directed to import control and any effect on post-import use was incidental. However, breach of a licence condition did not amount to an offence under Section 5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947, because the section penalised contravention of an order, not mere non-compliance with a licence term. The revisional application was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>