https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169493 Section 3 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 was construed broadly to authorise the Central Government to control exports by canalising trade through selected agencies or channels, including special or specialised agencies chosen for the object of the control. The majority also held that export policy and notifications restricting manganese ore exports to selected classes and routing trade through the State Trading Corporation did not amount to an unreasonable restriction under Article 19(1)(g), as the scheme rested on rational classification and served the general public interest. A dissent considered the canalisation scheme to be an unreasonable and monopoly-like restraint lacking fair rules and apportionment. en-us Mon, 16 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:21:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169493 Section 3 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 was construed broadly to authorise the Central Government to control exports by canalising trade through selected agencies or channels, including special or specialised agencies chosen for the object of the control. The majority also held that export policy and notifications restricting manganese ore exports to selected classes and routing trade through the State Trading Corporation did not amount to an unreasonable restriction under Article 19(1)(g), as the scheme rested on rational classification and served the general public interest. A dissent considered the canalisation scheme to be an unreasonable and monopoly-like restraint lacking fair rules and apportionment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169493