<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (9) TMI 46 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169489</link>
    <description>A retracted confession may sustain conviction where it is voluntary, true, and supported by general corroboration of its essential features. The confession here was recorded by a Magistrate after the prescribed warnings and time for reflection, so allegations of police pressure were rejected and voluntariness was established. It was also found true because it fit the surrounding evidence and probabilities, and minor omissions did not make it unreliable. Corroboration was sufficient because the presence of human blood on seized articles, without explanation, supported the broad version of the confession. The conviction was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:17:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (9) TMI 46 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169489</link>
      <description>A retracted confession may sustain conviction where it is voluntary, true, and supported by general corroboration of its essential features. The confession here was recorded by a Magistrate after the prescribed warnings and time for reflection, so allegations of police pressure were rejected and voluntariness was established. It was also found true because it fit the surrounding evidence and probabilities, and minor omissions did not make it unreliable. Corroboration was sufficient because the presence of human blood on seized articles, without explanation, supported the broad version of the confession. The conviction was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>