https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258894 The appellate tribunal set aside the duty demand confirmation against M/s.Kawatra Papers Ltd., confiscation of assets, and penalties. Allegations of clandestine paper removal were supported by documents. Rejection of cross-examination violated natural justice. Disputed reports and machine log sheets were pivotal. Criteria for clandestine removal charges were outlined. Defense inadequately considered in remand proceedings. The tribunal allowed appeals, emphasizing due process and evidence consideration. The judgment addressed procedural fairness, evidentiary standards, and establishing clandestine charges in excise matters. en-us Mon, 16 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:15:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258894 The appellate tribunal set aside the duty demand confirmation against M/s.Kawatra Papers Ltd., confiscation of assets, and penalties. Allegations of clandestine paper removal were supported by documents. Rejection of cross-examination violated natural justice. Disputed reports and machine log sheets were pivotal. Criteria for clandestine removal charges were outlined. Defense inadequately considered in remand proceedings. The tribunal allowed appeals, emphasizing due process and evidence consideration. The judgment addressed procedural fairness, evidentiary standards, and establishing clandestine charges in excise matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 16 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258894