<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 773 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258892</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to set aside duty demands related to alleged duty evasion based on commodity trading income, difference in sales figures, electricity consumption, capacity utilization, and value addition. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of substantial evidence in proving duty evasion allegations, particularly in cases involving intricate financial transactions and production data.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 08:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 773 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258892</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to set aside duty demands related to alleged duty evasion based on commodity trading income, difference in sales figures, electricity consumption, capacity utilization, and value addition. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of substantial evidence in proving duty evasion allegations, particularly in cases involving intricate financial transactions and production data.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>