<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 770 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258889</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a case involving misdeclaration of quantity and value in export documents, leading to a higher claim for duty drawback. The exporters&#039; argument that the misdeclaration was unintentional was rejected, with the Tribunal finding intentional misdeclaration based on discrepancies in invoice details. The Tribunal ruled that the misdeclaration constituted a breach of the Customs Act, leading to the confiscation of goods and imposition of a redemption fine. The matter was remanded for redetermination of the penalty and redemption fine, ultimately ruling in favor of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 770 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258889</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a case involving misdeclaration of quantity and value in export documents, leading to a higher claim for duty drawback. The exporters&#039; argument that the misdeclaration was unintentional was rejected, with the Tribunal finding intentional misdeclaration based on discrepancies in invoice details. The Tribunal ruled that the misdeclaration constituted a breach of the Customs Act, leading to the confiscation of goods and imposition of a redemption fine. The matter was remanded for redetermination of the penalty and redemption fine, ultimately ruling in favor of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>