<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 766 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by upholding the disallowance of payments to the Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) under Section 40(a)(i), rejecting the addition of amounts shown as liability to IMG Canada, dismissing the disallowance of payments to Tamil Nadu Tennis Association (TNTA) and All India Tennis Association (AITA) under Section 40(a)(i), and remitting the issue of reimbursement of expenses back to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 766 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by upholding the disallowance of payments to the Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) under Section 40(a)(i), rejecting the addition of amounts shown as liability to IMG Canada, dismissing the disallowance of payments to Tamil Nadu Tennis Association (TNTA) and All India Tennis Association (AITA) under Section 40(a)(i), and remitting the issue of reimbursement of expenses back to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>