<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 747 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258866</link>
    <description>The Accountant Member agreed with the CIT(A) and held that the addition under Section 68 was not sustainable. It was concluded that the sundry creditors were genuine trade liabilities and not unexplained cash credits. The Tribunal confirmed the deletion of the addition, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 747 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258866</link>
      <description>The Accountant Member agreed with the CIT(A) and held that the addition under Section 68 was not sustainable. It was concluded that the sundry creditors were genuine trade liabilities and not unexplained cash credits. The Tribunal confirmed the deletion of the addition, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>