<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant&#039;s Right to Cross-Examine Expert Denied in Capacity Expansion Case; Key to Validity of Report.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22628</link>
    <description>Area based exemption - expansion of installed capacity by more than 25% - Since the Commissioner&amp;#39;s conclusion is based on the expert opinion of Professor Arun Kumar, in our view, his cross examination by the appellant should have been permitted, as the report of Professor Arun Kumar is only an opinion whose correctness has to be tested by his cross examination - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:52:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:52:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant&#039;s Right to Cross-Examine Expert Denied in Capacity Expansion Case; Key to Validity of Report.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22628</link>
      <description>Area based exemption - expansion of installed capacity by more than 25% - Since the Commissioner&amp;#39;s conclusion is based on the expert opinion of Professor Arun Kumar, in our view, his cross examination by the appellant should have been permitted, as the report of Professor Arun Kumar is only an opinion whose correctness has to be tested by his cross examination - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:52:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=22628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>