https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258863 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's extension of stay application and appeal partially. It upheld the Adjudicating authority's decision on service tax liability but directed the appellant to clarify payment details from the Mumbai unit for the Silvassa unit. Penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were not imposed due to lack of conclusive evidence, with the appellant showing reasonable cause. The appeal succeeded in avoiding penalties, stressing the necessity of proper documentation for service tax payments to prevent liabilities and penalties. en-us Fri, 19 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Apr 2015 09:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258863 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's extension of stay application and appeal partially. It upheld the Adjudicating authority's decision on service tax liability but directed the appellant to clarify payment details from the Mumbai unit for the Silvassa unit. Penalties under sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were not imposed due to lack of conclusive evidence, with the appellant showing reasonable cause. The appeal succeeded in avoiding penalties, stressing the necessity of proper documentation for service tax payments to prevent liabilities and penalties. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 19 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258863