<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 740 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258859</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions citing res judicata due to the withdrawal of earlier petitions without specific liberty for a second filing. The judgment emphasized the importance of following legal procedures and seeking necessary permissions before initiating legal actions to avoid issues like res judicata. The court allowed for the return of the original orders upon submission of the necessary representation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:37:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 740 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258859</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions citing res judicata due to the withdrawal of earlier petitions without specific liberty for a second filing. The judgment emphasized the importance of following legal procedures and seeking necessary permissions before initiating legal actions to avoid issues like res judicata. The court allowed for the return of the original orders upon submission of the necessary representation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>