<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 734 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258853</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, setting aside the duty demands and penalties issued by the Commissioner. The Tribunal found that the reliance on private ledger account entries without proper cross-examination was insufficient to sustain the allegations of duty evasion. It emphasized the importance of conducting actual experiments to determine accurate power consumption and highlighted the discrepancies in power consumption ratios. The Tribunal concluded that the impugned orders were not sustainable due to the lack of concrete evidence supporting duty evasion, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 734 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258853</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, setting aside the duty demands and penalties issued by the Commissioner. The Tribunal found that the reliance on private ledger account entries without proper cross-examination was insufficient to sustain the allegations of duty evasion. It emphasized the importance of conducting actual experiments to determine accurate power consumption and highlighted the discrepancies in power consumption ratios. The Tribunal concluded that the impugned orders were not sustainable due to the lack of concrete evidence supporting duty evasion, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>