<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 721 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258840</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, providing relief on household expenses and remanding the interest disallowance issue for further verification. The addition of the unsecured loan was upheld due to insufficient proof of creditworthiness. The Tribunal emphasized the need for satisfactory explanations for cash credits, citing relevant case law. The order was pronounced on September 29, 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:34:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 721 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258840</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, providing relief on household expenses and remanding the interest disallowance issue for further verification. The addition of the unsecured loan was upheld due to insufficient proof of creditworthiness. The Tribunal emphasized the need for satisfactory explanations for cash credits, citing relevant case law. The order was pronounced on September 29, 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>