<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 713 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258832</link>
    <description>Marketing and management service receipts were not taxable in India as fees for included services because article 12(4)(b) of the India-US treaty requires a make-available element, and the services did not transfer technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes in that sense. The existence of a service permanent establishment did not alter that result where the relevant services were rendered outside India. Article 7(1) force of attraction also did not apply, because it extends only to business activity carried on in the source State through or alongside a permanent establishment and of the same or similar kind. The Revenue&#039;s alternative tax claim therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 19:34:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 713 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258832</link>
      <description>Marketing and management service receipts were not taxable in India as fees for included services because article 12(4)(b) of the India-US treaty requires a make-available element, and the services did not transfer technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes in that sense. The existence of a service permanent establishment did not alter that result where the relevant services were rendered outside India. Article 7(1) force of attraction also did not apply, because it extends only to business activity carried on in the source State through or alongside a permanent establishment and of the same or similar kind. The Revenue&#039;s alternative tax claim therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>