<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 710 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258829</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that no real income accrued to the assessee due to the reduction in the franchise fee from USD 45,000 to USD 22,500. The Tribunal found that the fee reduction was valid and properly documented through agreements and communications, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The order was pronounced on March 18, 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 06:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 710 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258829</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that no real income accrued to the assessee due to the reduction in the franchise fee from USD 45,000 to USD 22,500. The Tribunal found that the fee reduction was valid and properly documented through agreements and communications, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal. The order was pronounced on March 18, 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>