<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 707 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258826</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the partnership firm, directing the AO to allow the deduction for interest paid on partners&#039; capital under section 24(b). The Tribunal considered the capital deployed for construction as borrowed capital, related to premises let out by the firm, falling under &quot;Income from house property.&quot; This decision overturned the CIT(Appeals)&#039;s disallowance and upheld the precedent set in a previous year&#039;s decision favoring the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 707 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258826</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the partnership firm, directing the AO to allow the deduction for interest paid on partners&#039; capital under section 24(b). The Tribunal considered the capital deployed for construction as borrowed capital, related to premises let out by the firm, falling under &quot;Income from house property.&quot; This decision overturned the CIT(Appeals)&#039;s disallowance and upheld the precedent set in a previous year&#039;s decision favoring the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>