https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169482 A person not actually arraigned as an accused may be examined as a witness even if the testimony is self-incriminating, and the exclusion in the Indian Oaths Act does not extend to someone merely under investigation. Accomplice evidence is therefore admissible, subject to the usual caution and corroboration. Photostat copies of intercepted writings may be admitted where the originals are suppressed and the copies are shown to be faithful, and handwriting comparison based on such copies can also be accepted. Prior exposure to photographs does not necessarily vitiate identification where there is substantial independent corroboration. The use of one conspirator as a witness and the receipt of this evidence did not establish discrimination or a violation of constitutional guarantees. en-us Thu, 14 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:16:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169482 A person not actually arraigned as an accused may be examined as a witness even if the testimony is self-incriminating, and the exclusion in the Indian Oaths Act does not extend to someone merely under investigation. Accomplice evidence is therefore admissible, subject to the usual caution and corroboration. Photostat copies of intercepted writings may be admitted where the originals are suppressed and the copies are shown to be faithful, and handwriting comparison based on such copies can also be accepted. Prior exposure to photographs does not necessarily vitiate identification where there is substantial independent corroboration. The use of one conspirator as a witness and the receipt of this evidence did not establish discrimination or a violation of constitutional guarantees. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169482