https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169474 The SC considered whether identification evidence, recoveries, footprint evidence and absconding together proved participation in the murders. The identifications were accepted because the witnesses were believed by the courts below and the evidence was treated as corroborated by surrounding circumstances. Recovery of the rifle from one accused and the revolver from the other was accepted against the first accused, while an earlier acquittal on the Arms Act charge barred reliance on the same recovery against the second accused in later proceedings. Footprint evidence was treated as corroborative, and absconding was also regarded as an incriminating circumstance. On the combined evidence, the conviction and death sentences were upheld. en-us Fri, 04 Nov 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:44:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169474 The SC considered whether identification evidence, recoveries, footprint evidence and absconding together proved participation in the murders. The identifications were accepted because the witnesses were believed by the courts below and the evidence was treated as corroborated by surrounding circumstances. Recovery of the rifle from one accused and the revolver from the other was accepted against the first accused, while an earlier acquittal on the Arms Act charge barred reliance on the same recovery against the second accused in later proceedings. Footprint evidence was treated as corroborative, and absconding was also regarded as an incriminating circumstance. On the combined evidence, the conviction and death sentences were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Nov 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169474