<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (4) TMI 37 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169462</link>
    <description>Interest on borrowings was held not deductible under section 12(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 where the loans were used for household expenses, purchase of jewellery, and payment of advance tax. The governing test stated was whether the expenditure had a real nexus, direct or indirect, with earning the fixed-deposit income and was incurred solely for that purpose. Borrowings for personal outgoings did not satisfy that nexus, and choosing to borrow instead of using existing funds did not convert a personal expense into income-earning expenditure. The advance-tax borrowing likewise did not qualify, as it was directed to meeting a statutory liability and only incidentally related to the income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:20:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (4) TMI 37 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169462</link>
      <description>Interest on borrowings was held not deductible under section 12(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 where the loans were used for household expenses, purchase of jewellery, and payment of advance tax. The governing test stated was whether the expenditure had a real nexus, direct or indirect, with earning the fixed-deposit income and was incurred solely for that purpose. Borrowings for personal outgoings did not satisfy that nexus, and choosing to borrow instead of using existing funds did not convert a personal expense into income-earning expenditure. The advance-tax borrowing likewise did not qualify, as it was directed to meeting a statutory liability and only incidentally related to the income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=169462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>