https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258805 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a case involving the clearance of imported goods under the SAFTA agreement at a concessional rate of duty. The judgment allowed provisional clearance of the goods upon fulfilling specified conditions, including executing a bond, paying duty as per SAFTA notification, and depositing 35% of the remaining differential duty. The court emphasized the importance of procedural compliance with SAFTA notification and the validity of certificates of origin in determining the goods' origin. The decision clarified that observations on certificates were for provisional release only and would not impact future adjudication. en-us Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Dec 2015 11:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258805 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a case involving the clearance of imported goods under the SAFTA agreement at a concessional rate of duty. The judgment allowed provisional clearance of the goods upon fulfilling specified conditions, including executing a bond, paying duty as per SAFTA notification, and depositing 35% of the remaining differential duty. The court emphasized the importance of procedural compliance with SAFTA notification and the validity of certificates of origin in determining the goods' origin. The decision clarified that observations on certificates were for provisional release only and would not impact future adjudication. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258805