<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 682 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258801</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving disputes over revenue allocation and deductions under section 80IB(10). The Court emphasized the correct interpretation of the AOP agreement, upheld the eligibility for deduction under section 80IB(10), and noted the incorrect invocation of power under section 263. The judgment clarified legal principles on revenue allocation, deduction claims, and the jurisdiction of tax authorities in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 682 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258801</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case involving disputes over revenue allocation and deductions under section 80IB(10). The Court emphasized the correct interpretation of the AOP agreement, upheld the eligibility for deduction under section 80IB(10), and noted the incorrect invocation of power under section 263. The judgment clarified legal principles on revenue allocation, deduction claims, and the jurisdiction of tax authorities in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>