<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 669 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258788</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the land sold qualified as agricultural land, exempting it from capital gains tax. Additionally, the disallowance of expenses amounting to Rs. 20,00,000 was overturned due to insufficient evidence and lack of specific reasons provided by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeals and the assessees&#039; cross objections, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s findings on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 21:32:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 669 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258788</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the land sold qualified as agricultural land, exempting it from capital gains tax. Additionally, the disallowance of expenses amounting to Rs. 20,00,000 was overturned due to insufficient evidence and lack of specific reasons provided by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeals and the assessees&#039; cross objections, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s findings on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>